Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18831

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : TD05 - TD07 Full Version

An Aberrant Case of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Trachea in Female Patient: A Case Report


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63968.18366
Nabha Mahajan, Suresh Phatak, Avinash Dhok, Yash Jakhotia

1. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Suresh Phatak,
Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur-440019, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: suresh_phatak@yahoo.com

Abstract

Tracheal tumours can be either benign or malignant. Benign tumours grow slowly and may mimic the clinical presentation of chronic lung diseases, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Conversely, rapidly growing malignant tumours present early with locally advanced disease. Hereby, the authors present a case of a 54-year-old female who presented with complaints of breathlessness at rest and cough with expectoration for one year, with a background history of chronic bidi smoking for 20 years. Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) showed an ill-defined soft tissue mass lesion above the carina, partially obstructing its lumen with heterogeneous post-contrast enhancement. During bronchoscopy, an endotracheal pedunculated mass was observed in the proximal one-third of the trachea, occluding the distal airway. The excised mass was confirmed as Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) on histopathological examination {Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)}. The presence of co-morbid conditions in the patient, the site of the tumour, and the availability of treatment options are some of the factors that influence the survival rate of this rare airway tumour.

Keywords

Benign, Bronchoscopy, Malignant, Tracheal tumour

Case Report

A 54-year-old female patient presented to the Emergency Department with complaints of insidious onset and gradually progressive dyspnea and cough with expectoration for one year. She had a background history of chronic bidi smoking for the last 20 years. There were no constitutional symptoms such as anorexia or loss of appetite, and no history of haemoptysis. On examination, she exhibited tachypnoea and an audible wheeze. The patient was using accessory muscles of respiration. The trachea was central and vesicular breath sounds were heard. On room air patients oxygen saturation (SPO2) was maintained at 95%.

A routine blood workup revealed mild neutrophilic leukocytosis, while liver and renal functions, as well as other metabolic parameters, were normal. A MDCT chest examination showed an ill-defined soft tissue mass lesion measuring 23×18×22 mm with a density range of +20 to +48 HU. The lesion extended from the superior endplate of T1 to the superior endplate of T2, partially obstructing the tracheal lumen. The lesion was located approximately 6 cm from the carina, with its upper margin at the level of the manubrium. Posterior expansion beyond the boundaries of the tracheal edge and contact with the first thoracic vertebral body were observed from 4-9 o’clock, although no destruction of the vertebral body was noted (Table/Fig 1)a,b. Postcontrast analysis revealed heterogeneous enhancement (Table/Fig 2)a,b. There was no calcification or erosion of the thyroid cartilage, and fat planes with adjacent major vessels were maintained. During bronchoscopy examination, an endotracheal pedunculated mass was observed in the proximal one-third of the trachea, occluding the distal airway. Visualisation of the carina and the area distal to the obstruction was not possible (Table/Fig 3). In virtual bronchoscopy, an intraluminal mass lesion with an irrgegular surface was seen (Table/Fig 4).

The patient underwent surgery, and the excised mass was sent for histopathology, which confirmed SCC. Following surgical resection, there was a significant improvement in symptoms. The patient was also recommended adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, but patient declined it. At the three-month follow-up, the patient exhibited significant symptomatic improvement, with no dyspnea and minimal persistent dry cough.

Discussion

Primary tracheal tumours are rare clinical entities, accounting for less than 0.1% of all tumours. These tumours can be either malignant or benign but are generally challenging to diagnose and treat. Benign tumours are often misdiagnosed as asthma or chronic pulmonary illness, leading to delayed identification. Conversely, malignant tumours tend to be detected earlier due to their accelerated growth rate compared to benign tumours (1). Reported frequencies of respiratory tract cancer are very low, ranging from 0.075% to 0.19% in autopsy series. In adults, primary tracheal neoplasms are malignant in 90% of cases. Histological subtypes include SCC, carcinoid, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and, among benign neoplasms, squamous papilloma is the most common (2).

The presence of co-morbid conditions in the patient, the tumour’s location, and the availability of treatment options are factors that influence the survival rate of such rare airway tumours (3). In present case, early diagnosis through imaging and prompt surgical management led to significant symptomatic improvement. However, close follow-up is necessary to monitor for symptom recurrence and tumour reappearance since the patient opted against chemoradiation therapy. Conditions that can resemble tracheal masses include injuries following intubation, rare cases of tuberculous airway involvement, inflammatory stenoses related to collagen vascular diseases, idiopathic laryngotracheal strictures, malignant obstructions caused by metastatic lymph nodes in the trachea, as well as benign or malignant strictures affecting adjacent structures like the larynx or main bronchi (4). The most common tracheal tumour is SCC, which predominantly affects males two to four times more frequently than females (2). SCC is often asymptomatic initially but can manifest symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, dyspnea, haemoptysis, and wheezing when it obstructs over half of the airway’s diameter (2).

In individuals with generalised respiratory symptoms, a chest radiograph is typically the initial course of action. However, radiography has low sensitivity for tracheobronchial diseases and can overlook numerous lesions (4). The preferred investigative method is MDCT. On an MDCT scan, the mass may appear as a polypoidal or discrete sessile growth, eccentric airway luminal narrowing, or circumferential thickening of the tracheal wall in the lower part of the trachea. Since this tumour originates from the epithelium, its borders are often irregular. It may directly extend into the mediastinum or spread through the lymphatic system. Endobronchial SCC can cause pulmonary atelectasis or lobar collapse by obstructing the airways (2).

A similar case was reported by Agrawal V et al., where a 72-year-old lady, a former smoker, presented with a history of recurrent lower respiratory tract infections. MDCT evaluation and bronchoscopy revealed a soft tissue mass extending from the carina into the left mainstem and right upper lobe bronchus. Biopsy confirmed SCC. Due to extensive tracheal involvement, surgery was not feasible, and she received radiotherapy. Unfortunately, the patient progressively worsened and passed away 15 months after diagnosis (5).

Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) is an emerging technology that can provide valuable guidance during bronchoscopic procedures. Imaging-guided biopsy and dynamic Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (TBNA) with EBUS can improve diagnostic outcomes. EBUS can be performed using linear or radial probes. Linear EBUS-TBNA allows for faster diagnosis of hilar lymph nodes and mediastinal levels (6). Benign tumours typically show minimal to no uptake on FDG-PET and can be differentiated from malignant tumours. Most tracheobronchial SCC shows significant 18-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) uptake (7). Advancements in anesthetic and surgical techniques have facilitated a primary surgical approach, which is often preferred for the treatment of tracheal malignancies (8). Patients undergoing surgical treatment for tracheal masses have reported 5-year survival rates ranging from 41% to 57% (5).

Other treatment modalities include Radiation Therapy (RT) and chemotherapy. Patients treated with definitive RT have lower 5-year survival rates, ranging from 6% to 11% compared to surgery. Approximately one-third of cases involve patients with extensive locoregional disease who may not be suitable candidates for surgery. In such instances, RT has traditionally been the preferred treatment option, with limited research on the use of chemotherapy. Local recurrence is the primary pattern of failure in tracheobronchial SCC, occurring in a range of 19% to 73% of cases. However, distant failure is also significant, with reported rates between 13% and 46%. These findings suggest that incorporating chemotherapeutic regimens into the treatment of this disease may be beneficial, as they can address both local and distant failures (5).

Conclusion

Malignant tracheal tumours are very rare and are typically asymptomatic in the initial stages, often only being detected when they have already advanced. However, MDCT can diagnose suspected tracheal tumours at an early stage, enabling early treatment and potentially improving the survival rate.

References

1.
Macchiarini P. Primary tracheal tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(1):83-91. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Stevic R, Milenkovic B. Tracheobronchial tumors. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2016;8(11):3401-13. Available from: https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10537/html. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Saoud M, Patil M, Dhillon SS, Pokharel S, Picone A, Hennon M, et al. Rare airway tumours: An update on current diagnostic and management strategies. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(8):1922-34. Doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.40. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Ngo AVH, Walker CM, Chung JH, Takasugi JE, Stern EJ, Kanne JP, et al. Tumours and tumourlike conditions of the large airways. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:301-13.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Agrawal V, Marcoux JP, Rabin MS, Vernovsky I, Wee JO, Mak RH. Case report of tracheobronchial squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016;1(2):127-31. Doi: 10.1016/j. adro.2016.03.003. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Anantham D, Siyue Koh M, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound. Respir Med. 2009;103(10):1406-14. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Kim MA, Lee CH, Kang MJ. Tumours in the Tracheobronchial Tree: CT and FDG PET Features. RadioGraphics [Internet]. 2009;29(1):55-71. Available from: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.291085126. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Thotathil ZS, Agarwal JP, Shrivastava SK, Dinshaw KA. Primary malignant tumours of the trachea-the Tata Memorial Hospital experience. Med Princ Pract Int J Kuwait Univ Health Sci Cent. 2004;13(2):69-73.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63968.18366

Date of Submission: Mar 09, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 15, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 12, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com